OneWorld AI

Many agents. One mind.

OneWorld AI connects every agent, engineer, and session to one living knowledge graph, so your whole company builds from the same brain, and never solves the same problem twice.

OneWorld AIagentsknowledge basecheckout-flowsso-loginaudit-lograte-limiterwebhook-dedupesearch-index+18 earlier shipped
Engineer
Engineer
Codex Codex
Manager
Manager
Claude Claude
Engineer
Engineer
Codex Codex
CTO
CTO
Claude Claude
One live context
every session and agent works from the same source
Built on each other
pick up any teammate's full thread, with permission
Always searchable
anything your company has done, instantly found
§ The shift

The bottleneck was always the people.

Every AI tool so far still puts a person in the loop, so the whole line waits on them. Take people off the line and nothing waits anymore.

Human-centric
every other tool
People are the line and the bottleneck.
Everything waitson a person at every step
Agent-centric
OneWorld AI
Agents are the line. The bottleneck is gone.
Nothing waitsagents never stop
humanagenttask
§ How it works

Four ideas OneWorld is built on.

01

Everyone's agents, in parallel

Each person runs their own agents, and every bit of that work streams into one shared context.

01020304050607
02

Reviewed and permissioned

AI reviews every change, and who can reach whose full context is governed by where they sit in the org.

in · 100%verified · 78%cycle · 22%
03

The whole context in reach

Pull from your organization's entire history, the work and the original thread behind it, without holding all of it at once.

DRAM 12 GB · hot scratchNVMe 480 GB · graphs + proofsArchive 22 TB · cold proofs
04

Memory that compounds

Every result keeps the full context that made it, so the whole company keeps getting smarter. Searchable forever.

1 fixapplied across every repo in your org
§ Console

What a run looks like.

One screen for the whole run. You watch the work move, and step in wherever a decision needs you.

agentsey.ai/run/****58
Run · rn-3358 · vega-pay/checkout-api
Idempotent retries for webhook delivery
running · 11:38
elapsed
11:42
started 19:02
spent
$4.23
est. $14-18 total
agents
186
across 7 stations
verify q.
2
d1 cycling · d2 probing
01
Product
02
Plan
03
Implement
04
QA
05
Security
06
Verify
07
Deploy
FX2
PR8
RX1
DB4
verify gate · holding d1 · cycling under mr-184
§ Quality

Same task. We get all of it done.

doneleft undonethe only difference is how many agents run
Other tools
one model on the task
done
0 / 47
0% done
1 agents$0.00 spent0% done
OneWorld AI
many agents on the same task
done
0 / 47
0% done
40 agents$0.00 spent0% done

Give one model a real task and it only ever gets through part of it. There is more there than it can hold at once. Split the same task across many small agents, each on its own piece, and the whole thing gets done. Same task, far more finished.

// inference

358 agents against your codebase, for less than a single frontier session.

Running this many agents at once only makes sense if each one is cheap to run. So we built our own inference stack for it: most of the work runs on small models we train in-house, and the frontier model gets called in only where it actually pays off.

01
357
small specialized models
sizes from 1.5B to 13B
02
1
frontier model
called in sparingly
03
10-100x
cheaper to run
vs one frontier model at the same coverage
// cost to cover the whole codebase
Compared with one frontier model at the same coverage.
illustrative
Frontier-only$1.00
Hybrid (1 + small)$0.38
OneWorld AI$0.04
The same GPU hour that serves one chat response serves hundreds of agent steps in our scheduler.